TEHRAN - In a note, Kayhan addressed Iran's reciprocal response after Israel's October 26 attack on Iran and said: Some believe that if Iran shows a reciprocal response to the Zionist regime's aggression, we will witness the creation of dangerous conditions in which we enter into a full-scale military war.

If the Zionist regime really wants a direct military confrontation with the Islamic Republic of Iran, in one case it will lead to a full-scale military war with Iran, and that is when the Islamic Republic is in a weak position and unable to defend its interests and territorial integrity. Therefore, if Islamic Iran does not give a reciprocal and stronger response than what Israel has done by violating Iran's territory, it should wait for a full-scale military war. Accordingly, Israel needs a strong response. If there had been no Leader at the head of the country, the enemy would definitely have considered some behaviors of Iranian statesmen as signs of passivity and weakness, and in this case, today we would have seen highly dangerous and costly events.

Sobh-e-No: Opportunity to set the nuclear course

In an article, Sobh-e-No discussed the positions of Europe and the United States regarding Iran’s nuclear program. It wrote: The deadline for lifting JCPOA limitations is approaching and there is a possibility that the West will obstruct this path. Therefore, some experts believe that now is the best time for Iran to bring its nuclear program to a point of no return. If the Western countries seek to issue a resolution and put more pressure on Iran, the Islamic Republic should use this opportunity to change its defense and nuclear doctrine and adopt a more decisive position against threats. Although Iran is still seeking cooperation and resolving issues through dialogue, the confrontational behavior of the West has weakened the atmosphere of dialogue and forced Iran to take a decisive decision. Deciding on the future course will depend on the behavior of the IAEA Board of Governors and the European Troika in the coming days.

Hamshahri: Bibi using war with Iran to project himself

Hamshahri discussed the new claims by the Zionist regime’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the October 26 attack on Iran in an interview with Abolfazl Zohrevand, a member of the National Security and Foreign Policy Committee of the Parliament. He said: Netanyahu (known as Bibi) claimed that the attacks of Zionist fighters caused "serious damage" to a part of Iran's nuclear program, which will hinder the progress of Iran's activities in this area. He also claimed that during the recent attack of this regime, a serious blow had been inflicted on Iran's ability to produce missiles, and he tried to make it appear that "the sky of Iran has become defenseless" in the current situation. Regarding the criticism directed at Netanyahu's government after the attack and the emphasis by the critics that the attack was "very weak", the prime minister of this regime is now trying to justify everything by projecting himself. The reason why Netanyahu claims to have seriously hit Iran's missile capability is that he recently received new news that Iran is testing missiles that can change all equations. The recent claims of the prime minister of this regime are not to show power, but securing achievement for himself from the war with Iran to escape censure from the critics.

Ettelaat: Trump looking for profit in foreign policy

In an interview with Heshmatollah Falahat Pisheh, a former parliamentarian and expert on political issues, Ettelaat sought his views about the prospects of Iran-U.S. relations. He said: Trump will pursue the same past goals through new approaches. Trump’s policy is to make foreign policy profitable for America and reduce costs. For this reason, Trump is seeking to increase the costs for Iran. However, it seems that Trump is trying to offer a series of economic packages to Iran, and if his administration offers economic cooperation with Iran, Iran should welcome it. Trump's managerial approach is such that his cabinet members make bargains and even threats, and we can see that Trump has chosen persons who have made the harshest remarks against Iran. These people make threats, but when it comes to negotiations, it is Trump who tries to declare the final agreement in the form of an agreement.